11/07/2007
This Supreme Court Case Could Really Cost the Economy A Lot
Chief Justice John Roberts suggested expanded judicial review is appropriate in this instance, pointing to the fact that the two sides negotiated a contract with court review as one of its provisions. Justices David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Antonin Scalia suggested Mattel might be seeking more latitude than the law allows for parties to negotiate expanded judicial review in arbitration cases. The American Arbitration Association says a cornerstone principle of federal law is that arbitrators' awards are final and binding. If parties to a dispute are allowed to engage in expanded judicial review, arbitration will become a prelude to lawsuits instead of a substitute, the association said in court papers. . . . .
But this takes the cake:
As Roberts points out, if the companies wanted the option to go to court, they can put that in the arbitrarion agreement. You would need to have some explanation for why companies can't figure out what is in there interest (supposedly though this wouldn't then apply to the wireless industry). Even opening up this question up will raise the risks of using arbitration agreements.
Labels: Economics
Concealed Handgun Permit holders Stop Armed Robbers in Orlando, Florida
Both men opened fire rather than surrender their wallets. The robbers beat it.
"They left with broken egos. They didn't get nothing from us," Juan Amezaga said Tuesday. "If more people stood up for themselves, a lot of crime could be prevented. And the concealed-weapons permit, that's great." . . .
Labels: ConcealedCarry, DefensiveGunUse
Fred Thompson Answers Questions on Guns for Field and Stream
Labels: 2008PresidentialRace, FredThompson, GunControl
US Troops Cheating on Medical Tests to Remain Fighting in Iraq
Troops had obtained copies of an older version of the test and memorized key words used to gauge short-term memory, Jaffee says. Those who fail areas of the test undergo more sophisticated exams for diagnosing brain injury.
If symptoms persist, soldiers are sent home. If symptoms get better in days or a few weeks, patients can be sent back into combat, doctors say. . . . .
Labels: Other
Another Multiple Victim Public Shooting in Another Country
The shooter — an 18-year-old man — was still inside the school along with some students who had not managed to escape, said Heidi Hagman, assistant to the Tuusula municipality director . . . .
Labels: GunControl, GunFreeZone
Obesity 'fuels cancer in women': Wrongly Scaring People
Ironically, there is another study that just came out that claims simply being "overweight" lowers one's chance of getting cancer:
Well, let's just assume for a minute that the first scary claim is correct and also that the cancer is not the result of something that is also causing the women to be fat (e.g., depression may cause both obesity and cancer). According to the BBC article 4.5 million women are between 50 and 64 in the UK and 57 percent of those are obese or overweight. That comes to 2,565,000. Of those women, if we believe these claims, 6,000 will get cancer or any type each year (it would have been nice to know how many of them died from it, but that is another issue). Anyway, that means that 0.23 percent of these overweight or obese women get cancer each year because of their weight. I wouldn't want to be that less than quarter of one percent, but this doesn't sound like something to panic over. While there is no breakdown for the cancers "caused" by overweight, about one-third of cancers generally are said to result in death so that if true for these cancers, it means that .078 percent die. That is less than one tenth of one percent die from cancer.
11/06/2007
Lemuel Calhoon's Review of Freedomnomics
Labels: BookReviews, Freedomnomics
Email on the Death Penalty
I just want to comment that , to me, it doesn't matter if it's a deterent or not.
The death penalty IS justice ( rightful. fair and deserved punishment ) to the murderer for what was done to the victim (s) and their family. Simple_ as_ that. But.. it also needs to be
implemented, not ignored or postponed.
Our 12 year old daughter was murdered by a man in 1981, who has been on Death Row (Cal.) for 25 years with no execution date in sight. He has free meals, Cable T.V. and better medical care than we do.
Justice, for us, has failed.
Labels: DeathPenalty
University of North Dakota might be forced to remove "Fighting Sioux" Logo
I would think that the Sioux indians would be proud to have a team referred to as the "Fighting Sioux." Will their be an objection to the Army helicopters having indian names? What is the difference? Why does the NCAA find this objectionable?
Labels: PoliticalCorrectness
Hubris and Carbon Taxes
1) It is hard enough to get the direction of effects correct. There is a debate right now over global warming and what share might be attributable to man. Only a tiny fraction of greenhouse gases (may be a percentage point or so) is due to mankind. Of course, there are other causes such as energy output from the sun that we don't control at all. Even if we agree on manmade global warming being significant, there is still the next question of whether there is a net cost from it. Sea levels might possibly go up by a foot or so over the next hundred years, but human disease will decline and there will be more food. Probably even in the worst case scenario, a small effect on global warming has a small effect on net costs.
2) Even if we get the point estimate of the size of the externality correct, there is the problem of assuming that the government will impose the right tax. Having too high of a tax is just as bad as having too small of a tax. Why do we believe that the government will actually pass legislation that has the right tax?
3) We already have high gasoline taxes. How do we know that the level of taxes are not already too high? Possibly we should be lowering the gas tax, not raising it. Taxes on gasoline are very high as it is.
4) What is the cost of getting this wrong? The cost is that we will be poorer, and there are lots of coststo being poorer, included a lower life expectancy.
Mankiw is an advisor to Romney, which makes me worry about him some. Today is a reminder about the Democrats in the Washington Post today.
Labels: Environment, GlobalWarming
Russell Roberts Unable to Respond to the Answer that I gave him?
I wrote him back:
After several responses back and forth I wrote Russell that: "The best that I can see in you response to what I wrote is 'So let me try again. Very few econometric analyses persuade skeptics.' You have a similar response on your blog. It does not appear to me that this is a helpful response nor is it very direct. Explain why my responses, particularly the instrument regarding women's voting, doesn't meet your concerns. You asked for an example and I gave you one that used an instrument. I have yet to see one paper challenge the instrument that we used on women's voting, and you provide no logical objection."
(Cut)
Russell asks that I not print his reply.
Labels: Research, RussellRoberts
11/05/2007
A few defensive gun use stories from this week
UPDATE: You can also search the NRA's armed citizen archieves here. See also here for other sources.
Labels: DefensiveGunUse
TV News Report of Armed Self Defense
Labels: DefensiveGunUse
John Edwards Ad Effectively Smashes Hillary Over Inconsistencies.
Labels: 2008PresidentialRace, HillaryClinton
Texas Tech Students help push for ending gun free zones on campus
Hoping to raise awareness about the issues surrounding the prohibition of licensed firearm possession on college campuses, students attending approximately 110 college institutions nationwide organized a protest at their respective campuses.
An estimated 6,000 members of Students for Concealed Carry on Campus, the national organization of discontented gun owners, will symbolize their plight all week by donning empty holsters.
The group, however, is not advocating just any possession of weapons, he said. It designed the protests specifically to promote licensed and responsible carrying of handguns throughout all parts of campuses. . . . .
Labels: ConcealedCarry, GunFreeZone
11/04/2007
Fred Thompson on Gun-Free Zones
Virginia Tech, last April 32 killed, terrible tragedy. You had a radio report back at that time, and I’d like to share it with you and our viewers. “Virginia Tech,” the “administrators overrode Virginia state law and threatened to expel or fire anybody who brings a weapon,” on the “campus. Many other universities have been swayed by an anti-gun, anti-self defense ideology. Whenever I’ve seen one of those ‘Gun-free zone’ signs, especially outside of a school filled with our youngest and most vulnerable citizens, I’ve always wondered exactly who these signs are directed at.”
My sense in reading that is that you would be in favor of licensed citizens of Virginia, students, including students, to carry concealed weapons on a college campus.
MR. THOMPSON: It would have to be consistent with campus rules. I don’t think that all students need to be carrying weapons on the school campus. What I would, I would feel more comfortable with, if a child of mine was on campus, when I read about these people, 30 people or so being lined up and systematically killed without anybody apparently around to do anything about it, I think some, some thought really needs to be given as to who should be properly qualified and permitted and, and armed on campuses and other places where large people gather. But...
MR. RUSSERT: But you would, you would allow a campus to bar their students from carrying concealed weapons?
MR. THOMPSON: Yeah, it, it would have to be consistent with state law and, and, and school rules. And different schools would have, you know, the, the freedom to, to have their own rules as, as, as they see fit. . . . .
The take at the National Review Online was pretty positive:
Labels: ConcealedCarry, GunFreeZone
Democrats in Pennsylvania in Trouble?
"I have seen in our internal investigations no evidence that behavior was illegal," DeWeese told The Associated Press. "But that's not for me to decide. That's for the attorney general and his team."
The investigation seems to have everyone in Pennsylvania's State Capitol holding their breath as witnesses are being dragged before the grand jury and both parties in the House have been hit with subpoenas.
In August, investigators seized 20 boxes of records from the House Democratic research office, touching off a separation-of-powers legal battle. On Thursday, a petition by the House Democrats seeking to block access to the records was denied by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. . . . .
Labels: Corruption
Students for Concealed Carry Versus Gun Control Groups on Campus
At the University of Virginia, though, students organized a lie-in on Oct. 16 that coincided with the six-month anniversary of the Virginia Tech shootings. Spangler has also tapped Facebook to try to recruit more organizers in college; her group currently has 218 members, not an insignificant number but far less than that of many advocacy organizations on the site — including Students for Concealed Carry on Campus, which has 7,542 members. . . . .
Well, 218 to 7,542 is progress, though I suspect that we have a ways to go still.
Labels: ConcealedCarry, GunFreeZone
Stage 2 of Roger's Eagle Project
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgBf7-hmHXEjEYCfqNjxm1eRaaOABTclWxHNnnWg3fRdFAwaDolUCSfHNEHBKDgVhe8sowe-TIM6At3jI0xRLPXLoLA8QKROeoZHzRbTSUX5vV7U_erNMz-UEMBCFiVgRKbQyAf/s200/Eagle+1.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhlL3JykHCFf2e62hklxjT-1XT3p1LKIDidT44rhzTVcbQzFLHewcdYo0OGZ5b2v9sr5NuxySyu3CQzfI_6xpqJZvVK4ai6L-8MUqRyNdrau70e9tiwxWfFc8T_Jp6wOFQRAUpd/s200/Eagle+2.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhaZcE8M66HRK-2RpRRUU8rVVsXMFdMGkiYw6XfkH8qb6996RtuxVxRkFlvTnos9jawajpXh0Yk-Ty3akIGEom-Xzp1OkevAKPO7mV7IPVreSoWr0u40djXcfbdcTYKDlc7JA62/s200/Eagle+3.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjYoNjFsAqaiG9ZOqLb99HZjawrd-CwA0EA8Xy-Ln_mtawaQNk_F8HY4GFKj4RuQW6EOulNzBcF-Zj9e03wd-BgEHOc0qzGC5sTQ3jT2U6z_eFtefuhRRqZMIpvqDXfCGERnAs9/s200/Eagle+4.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEilCbi5FZeaRtNek9zoIzYfih3r-kBAihNaNDxXuNMgJA6N2RIU24nL0TCQQIvA_qbaucB20-otLQR9F73WfM9kl99G45G-Bhj-ZqJyW9BcnY0KEja7aeG6ERfKfa3U-4GXbwoL/s200/Eagle+6.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEinnBx62-OANFBS6Ev1XDoWf3J0oh0BK8i2koEfab2lpUfGsUtufzAOmmL7RujR_cKs7Viet20sjbTnhVM0NkEvXimRJsIpKHZBcRztdquDknrvkhd69JyLqYjwP2jIWb0CRs1o/s200/Eagle+5.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtHRGGzt4tL4cMJ8RJs_meykUgWyCq4HjdKs9ZK_gdqOZtYV-8TUEyWZeojywLMrbonTkwwBzCAZ_Vk22_R6tlzg2hICQyorWEJ3awL_7lrRfWY3LqbwVdOJI-__BuCl785-2P/s200/Eagle+9.jpg)
Labels: EagleProject
11/03/2007
The Muslim World's Dr. Phil: The Secret of a Good Marriage, Beat Your Wife
Labels: BizarreClaims
11/02/2007
Anonymous Reporting System for Reporting Bias at William & Mary
The Bias Reporting System was created several weeks ago by the College Diversity Committee and exists “to assist members of the William and Mary community who have been affected by incidents involving bias related to race, gender, sexual orientation, religion or other protected conditions.”
Sam Sadler, vice president for student affairs and co-chair of the Bias Reporting Team, said that “showing a willingness to look at issues is the best way I know to let people know that the community cares. I think it’s really the ultimate statement of community.”
Critics worry that the system is open to abuse because it allows anonymous reports. A full-page ad in The Flat Hat last week, paid for by FreeAmericasAlmaMater.org, brings up the possibility that students could make up allegations to get back at professors who gave them a bad grade or significant others who had broken up with them. . . . .
My son Maxim wrote this story up.
Labels: PoliticalCorrectness
What is behind the push for Driver Licenses for Illegals?
The next day she took a firmer stand (sort of) by offering general support for Gov. Spitzer's approach, but adding that she hadn't studied his specific plan. She should, and so should the rest of us. It stops just short of being an engraved invitation for people to commit voter fraud.
The background here is the National Voter Registration Act, commonly known as "Motor Voter," that President Bill Clinton signed into law in 1993. It required all states to offer voter registration to anyone getting a driver's license. One simply fills out a form and checks a box stating he is a citizen; he is then registered and in most states does not have to show any ID to vote. . . . .
The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms has its own take on this here.
Labels: VoteFraud
What if Hillary's Campaign Implodes?
Labels: 2008PresidentialRace, HillaryClinton
Another Review of Freedomnomics
Freedomnomics, translating economics into regular English, shows that bureaucratic and judicial attempts to correct the market restore feudalism and hurt the poor. Corporate scandals that lower a firm's reputation create disincentives to cheat and thus become part of a self-correcting market mechanism. Lott also discerns the true link between legalized abortion and crime: In opposition to the best-selling book Freakonomics, he shows that easy access to abortion leads to change in attitudes to premarital sex, more out-of-wedlock children, family breakdown, and thus to more crime. . . . .
Labels: BookReviews, Freedomnomics
New Op-ed: DEATH PENALTY'S DEADLY VACATION
This is just the latest example of the whittling away of the death penalty - the courts have already cut executions by over a third since 1999. But this latest suspension of executions is likely to demonstrate yet again that the death penalty deters crime. . . . .
Some comments are coming in on this piece. See this by Art DeVany, Clayton Cramer, Free Republic, and Prairie Pundit.
I got this email from someone who read my piece.
The problem is that the gap between blacks and their share of executions and murders has gotten larger over time. This was originally in the op-ed, but got cut for space constraints. (The numbers before 1980 are pretty meaningless because even when an execution took place, there was only one execution a year.)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhM-jcQHJgntKgND0cMiE6CZ995SzL6k8KWDMg4N5hzi_EXUbxIkPdJg21ddb06Fw5KOX1YH0l42uBqccf9mFhG-n5bvYddkO0fX2yGwszys4_Pwu92c-efANfUXq5ZyPjfxBNx/s400/Picture+4.png)
There are two points. 1) The point of the piece was to address some of the general arguments that have been presented agains the death penalty. 2) There are so many issues that one can get into in 700 words. I figured most people know this claim you point to and can judge for themselves whether lethal injection is so cruel.
Does the moratorium increase the chances that the death penalty through lethal injection will be ended? If lethal injection is found to be "cruel," would hanging or a firing squad be cruel? In any case, does it then lower the cost of criminals committing murder?
Thanks for you thoughtful comments. But I must confess that I don't know what "jack story" means.
A further discussion of these issues can be found in my book, Freedomnomics.
Labels: Crime, DeathPenalty, op-ed
An Analysis of Concealed Permit Holders in Tennessee
The actual TV report can be seen here. One county apparently had 11 percent of people with permits. The survey that they are referring to about the US having the highest gun ownership rate in the world is wrong. The study paid for by George Soros confused total guns with gun ownership rate.
Thanks to SayUncle and Clint Kritzer.
Labels: ConcealedCarry, numberpermits
11/01/2007
The Brady Campaign gets some examples of bad uses of guns wrong
Labels: ConcealedCarry
Roberts and Hanson Rounds II and III
No Roberts tries to impose the obiligation on those who might know the empirical literature better.
Such cynicism can come cheap. It also seems to leave us with anecdotes. Well, there's also common sense, intuition and general lessons gleaned from experience and empirical work that is less prone to manipulation.
So again, my question to my better-read colleagues in the profession--give me an example of a statistical analysis that relies on instrumental variables, for example, that is done well enough, that is so iron-clad, that it can reverse the prior beliefs of a skeptic.
OK, let me give Russell a response. These points and other similar ones are in my book Freedomnomics. The second point below is also in More Guns, Less Crime. I realize that Russell hasn't had time to read either book, but before he comments more on these types of empirical work, he might benefit from reading them.
1) I don't put a huge amount of weight often on instrumental variables, but let me give one example from my own work on giving women the right to vote. The instrument there is whether states voluntarily or were forced to give women the right to vote. We found that both types of states experienced a similar increase in government growth after women were given the right to vote. If it was simply increased liberalism by men that caused both suffrage for women and government growth, you should see that in states that reached a critical mass to voluntarily give women the right to vote, but not in others where states were forced to given them a vote.
2) Regarding correlation and causation that is precisely why some research try to provide many qualitatively different empirical tests. For example, with right-to-carry laws: 1) violent crime falls, 2) the size of the drop increases over time the longer the law is in effect because more permits are issued, 3) there are differences between violent crimes where a criminal comes in contact with a victim who might be able to defend herself and a property crime where there is no contact (violent crimes fall relative to property crimes), 4) there are differences between different types of violent crimes (e.g., between murder generally and multiple victim public shootings because the probability that someone will be able to defend themselves with multiple victim public shootings is much higher than the case where there is only one or two victims present), 5) a comparison between adjacent counties on opposite sides of a state border, and 6) differential benefits across different types of victims.
Russell, try to come up with an alternative explanation for these different findings.
As a general comment, I am disappointed how vague Roberts' discussion is and how filled it is with platitudes.
Finally, Robin Hanson summarizes where Russell might be coming out on all this: "Russ finally answers as I'd originally expected: he relies on simpler clearer data and theory. " I think that there is a lot of regression and empirical work that uses very simple approaches (see the above reference to women voting or I would even argue many issues involving concealed handguns such as permit holders being extremely law-abiding and not posing a risk by themselves), So Russell, what do you have to say to that? In addition, Russell, I don't think that Ayres conceded anything to you on Friedman's Monetary History.
Labels: ConcealedCarry, Research, RussellRoberts
Christmas gift ideas for little ones
Labels: Christmasgifts
Backlash by Women Because They Feel People have been Attacking Hillary?
I am not sure that Obama or Edwards would have had a chance with these voters in the first place.
Labels: 2008PresidentialRace, HillaryClinton
Mascot Violence in College Sports: A Growing Problem?
Labels: Fun