6/20/2011

UVA won't release university emails from climatologist Michael Mann

There does seem to be a double standard on all this.

Blogger Glenn Reynolds recently circulated a comment that highlights yet another glaring inconsistency among the establishment media.

Major organs of the press have been so eager to air the dirty laundry from Sarah Palin's emails — obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request — that they have turned to "crowdsourcing" to expedite the job. In other words, they're disseminating the material to the general readership so they can find the juicy bits faster.

Contrast that with the vitriol and scorn heaped on conservatives who have requested that the University of Virginia divulge emails written by climatologist Michael Mann when he was employed there. The very idea that anyone would request such private material is an atrocious assault on privacy and academic freedom, is the general view — at least inside liberal echo chambers.

True, Palin and Mann are differently situated. Although both are now private citizens and although all the emails in question were written on the government dime, he has never run for public office, while she has. But the differences are not nearly so great as the manner in which the two cases — or, for that matter, the earlier Climategate email controversy — have been treated. . . .

Labels: , ,

1 Comments:

Blogger Chas said...

Markie Marxist sez: "Our Marxist 'transparency' has such a wonderfully opaque quality to it, doesn't it?"

6/21/2011 7:38 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home