5/26/2009

National Rifle Assoc v. City of Chicago

The oral arguments before the 7th Circuit can be heard here. This was a tough panel. I would guess that the final decision will be 2-to-1 or 3-to-0 in favor of the Chicago position.

Here is the segment where Judge Frank Easterbrook brings up a reference to my work, though he is arguing that it isn't relevant to the discussion.

Labels: , , ,

1 Comments:

Blogger Edmund Dantes said...

Note that at least one of these judges couldn't be bothered to read the briefs: he doubted that the congress that proposed the 14th amendment wanted an armed Southern population. Souter (or Bryars) displayed similar chilling ignorance of fully briefed material in the Heller argument. Some of these people simply don't take their job very seriously.

5/27/2009 1:46 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home