7/26/2006
- Name: John Lott
- Location: Virginia, United States
About Me
My commentary on a broad array of economics and crime related issues.
Most of my posts are now at the Crime Prevention Research Center. Our work is very important and you will find the latest information available there. Please click here or go to crimeresearch.org to get that information.
E-mail: johnrlott@crimeresearch.org
Academic Papers
- Terms of Use
Copyright 2005 by John R. Lott, Jr. All rights reserved
My Op-eds
More Books of Mine
Dumbing Down the Courts: How Politics Keeps the Smartest Judges Off the Bench
Straight Shooting: Firearms, Economics and Public Policy
Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe?
Reviews of Freedomnomics
Other Web sites
Previous Posts
- Snakes and human evolution
- Levitt's argument for dismissal
- Woman uses shotgun to stop wolf attack
- Gun Ownership in Mexico (or the lack of legal gun ...
- So which side is more heroic?
- More trouble for Senator Joe Lieberman from Bill C...
- Close race could determine passage of right-to-car...
- Concealed handgum permit holder stops knife attack
- Amusing reasons for why people are fatter
- Jennifer Granholm: Anti-self-defense Governor forc...
Book Reviews
- For a list of book reviews on The Bias Against Guns, click here.
Interesting Past Topics
-Research finding a drop in violent crime rates from Right-to-carry laws
-Ranking Economists
-Interview with the Washington Post
-Debate on "Guns Reduce Crime"
-Appalachian law school attack
-Sources for Defensive Gun Uses
-The Merced Pitchfork Killings
-Fraudulent website pretending to be run by me
-Steve Levitt's Correction Letter
-Ian Ayres and John Donohue
-Other issues regarding Steve Levitt
-National Academies of Science Panel on Firearms
-Baghdad murder rate
-Arming Pilots
-General discussion of my 1997 and 2002 surveys as well as related surveys
-Problems with Wikipedia
-Errata for Gun Books
-US Supreme Court Wire
-Futures for Financial Markets
-judgepedia
Links
Economist and Law Professor David D. Friedman's Blog
Larry Elder's The Elder Statement
Economist Robert G. Hansen's Blog
Firearmstruth.com -- a media-watchdog website
A debate that I had with George Mason University's Robert Ehrlich on guns
Lyonette Louis-Jacques's page on Firearms Regulation Worldwide
An interview concerning More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws
The End of Myth: An Interview with Dr. John Lott
Art DeVany's website, one of the more innovative economists in the last few decades
St. Cloud State University Scholars
Bryan Caplan at George Mason University
Alphecca -- weekly review on the media's coverage of guns
Xrlq -- Some interesting coverage of the law.
Career Police Officer
Gun Law News
Georgia Right-to-Carry
Darnell's The Independent Conservative Blog
Robert Stacy McCain's Blog
Clayton Cramer's Blog
My hidden mathematical ability (a math professor with the same name)
geekwitha45
My Old AEI Web Page
Wrightwing's blog
Al Lowe's blog
St. Maximos' Hut
Dad29
Elizabeth Blackney's blog
Eric Rasmusen
Your "Economics" Portal to the World by Larry Low
William Sjostrom
Dr. T's EconLinks.com
Interview with National Review Online
Blog at Newsmax.com
Pieces I have written at BigGovernment.com
Data
- Johnlott.org
(description of book, downloadable data sets, and discussions of previous controversies)
Updated Media Analysis of Appalachian Law School Attack
Journal of Legal Studies paper on spoiled ballots during the 2000 Presidential Election
Data set from USA Today, STATA 7.0 data set
"Do" File for some of the basic regressions from the paper
4 Comments:
Oddly enough (for an ardent gun nut), I have no problem with other nations reaching agreements regarding their own involvement with the arms trade. If the people of these nations don't have the intelligence and/or backbone to protest such fascism, then they deserve what they get.
What I despise is when such 'agreements' are trojan horses for imposing gun control *within* other nations (notably ours). IANSA et al do not seem to understand, or care, that such an imposition is technically *impossible* under our Constitution. Our President is our *employee* and is not authorized to effect such change...it requires an amendment - agreed to by we the people! Some have speculated on back-door routes to circumnavigate this constraint, however...
I think that the correct American response should be to refuse all arms trade with the *governments* (of such conspiring nations) that enslave their people by barring them from arms.
If ones' integrity and conviction in the 2nd Amendment stretches only as far as money, then no matter the amount, you are the cheapest of whores.
Wouldn't a valid Treaty, signed by a Democratic President, and ratified by a Democratic Congress, supercede any Constitutional documents?
That is how the gun grabbers intend to "backdoor" their dastardly plans. They couldn't get what they wanted through "concensus" so now they are going to try the UN General Assembly, which only requires a majority vote. They want a legally binding treaty, while the "Programme of Action" was only voluntary.
Don't get complacent. Don't think it can't happen to you, too.
Yes nimrod, you correctly highlight the "back-door" I was alluding to :-)
The NRA is fully aware of this potential route also, and has raised the warning flag already...but I still have my doubts.
Can a President and/or Congress *legally* commit America to a treaty that is unconstitutional? My understanding is that they cannot, and if they do, it should correctly be voided by the SCOTUS (whether or not we can trust the SCOTUS to do its duty is another matter). Neither the President nor Congress has the authority to commit the American people to unconstitutional law.
Surely the act of engaging in such unconstitutional and illegal conduct would be clear grounds for impeachment?
Either way, you are correct to warn against complacency!
Post a Comment
<< Home