9/19/2009

One of the more novel aspects of campaign finance regulations?

If one really believes campaign finance advocates, this has to be counted as a campaign expenditures.

According to people familiar with the grand jury investigation, prosecutors are considering a complicated and novel legal issue: whether payments to a candidate’s mistress to ensure her silence (and thus maintain the candidate’s viability) should be considered campaign donations and thus whether they should be reported. When Mr. Edwards was running for president, and even later when he still held out hope of a senior cabinet position in the Obama administration, two of his wealthy patrons, through a once-trusted Edwards aide, quietly provided Ms. Hunter with large financial benefits, including a new BMW and lodging, that were used to keep her out of public view. . . .


But how much was this action by Mr. Andrew Young worth? Was it worth more than $2,300? Should it also be counted as a donation to the campaign?

The notion that Mr. Edwards is the father has been reinforced by the account of Andrew Young, once a close aide to Mr. Edwards, who had signed an affidavit asserting that he was the father of Ms. Hunter’s child. . . .

Labels:

1 Comments:

Blogger Proof said...

If payments to your mistress are campaign expenditures, would visits to hookers be considered payment in kind?

9/19/2009 11:29 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home