Some pieces in the Washington Times
Gee whiz, 367 miles per gallon!: Don't believe the baloney about electric cars
Learning from Canada's mistakes: Nationalized health care is doomed to fail
Labels: Energy, healthcare, Washingtontimes
Welcome! Follow me on twitter at @johnrlottjr or at https://crimeresearch.org. Please e-mail questions to johnrlott@crimeresearch.org.
Labels: Energy, healthcare, Washingtontimes
posted by John Lott at 2:21 AM
My commentary on a broad array of economics and crime related issues.
Dumbing Down the Courts: How Politics Keeps the Smartest Judges Off the Bench
Straight Shooting: Firearms, Economics and Public Policy
Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe?
-Research finding a drop in violent crime rates from Right-to-carry laws
-Ranking Economists
-Interview with the Washington Post
-Debate on "Guns Reduce Crime"
-Appalachian law school attack
-Sources for Defensive Gun Uses
-The Merced Pitchfork Killings
-Fraudulent website pretending to be run by me
-Steve Levitt's Correction Letter
-Ian Ayres and John Donohue
-Other issues regarding Steve Levitt
-National Academies of Science Panel on Firearms
-Baghdad murder rate
-Arming Pilots
-General discussion of my 1997 and 2002 surveys as well as related surveys
-Problems with Wikipedia
-Errata for Gun Books
-US Supreme Court Wire
-Futures for Financial Markets
-judgepedia
Economist and Law Professor David D. Friedman's Blog
Larry Elder's The Elder Statement
Economist Robert G. Hansen's Blog
Firearmstruth.com -- a media-watchdog website
A debate that I had with George Mason University's Robert Ehrlich on guns
Lyonette Louis-Jacques's page on Firearms Regulation Worldwide
An interview concerning More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws
The End of Myth: An Interview with Dr. John Lott
Art DeVany's website, one of the more innovative economists in the last few decades
St. Cloud State University Scholars
Bryan Caplan at George Mason University
Alphecca -- weekly review on the media's coverage of guns
Xrlq -- Some interesting coverage of the law.
Career Police Officer
Gun Law News
Georgia Right-to-Carry
Darnell's The Independent Conservative Blog
Robert Stacy McCain's Blog
Clayton Cramer's Blog
My hidden mathematical ability (a math professor with the same name)
geekwitha45
My Old AEI Web Page
Wrightwing's blog
Al Lowe's blog
St. Maximos' Hut
Dad29
Elizabeth Blackney's blog
Eric Rasmusen
Your "Economics" Portal to the World by Larry Low
William Sjostrom
Dr. T's EconLinks.com
Interview with National Review Online
Blog at Newsmax.com
Pieces I have written at BigGovernment.com
Updated Media Analysis of Appalachian Law School Attack
Journal of Legal Studies paper on spoiled ballots during the 2000 Presidential Election
Data set from USA Today, STATA 7.0 data set
"Do" File for some of the basic regressions from the paper
2 Comments:
US health care could do with some reforms. But not in any of the ways being put forth in the bills currently in play. As I have said before, Congress is determined to scrap our stretch-limo system because there is a stain on one of the armrests, and replace it with a Yugo modified to be pedal-powered.
Why always look at UK/Canada? Even if "national health care" is the aim, look at other places: France, or even Spain? The governments do pay, but mostly heavily regulate while leaving most actual care (doctors, hospitals, etc.) private and allowing insurance (the UK will allow you to buy private insurance, but not as a supplement - if you buy you lose all NHS coverage).
Or compare Texas with Massachusetts. A big difference - the Texas legislation included considerable tort reform protecting health carers: costs went down, doctors started moving in, more insurance companies moved in thus driving costs down a bit more. Oh, it has problems: an unintended consequence is the formation of actual "death panels" in which a hospital can decide to "pull the plug" regardless of patient/family/guardian wishes...
I have a Toyota Camry and it gets good mileage. One day, commuting home from work, I had the cruise control set to 65mph. I was recharging my GPS device when I noticed it said I was doing only 59mph. I just blew it off as some strange anomoly.
Another time, I drove past one of those radar-operated speed signs telling me how fast I was going. The offical speed limit was 40 and I was just slightly above that. But my GPS said 37mph.
Then it dawned on me. I believe the speedometer is false. It has been set to show your speed to be about 5mph faster that what you are actually driving.
This works fine for everyone.
- The auto company gets to say their car has a good mileage rating at a specific speed.
- The EPA doesn't care because their guidelines are being met.
- The police don't care because you're driving slower.
- The insurance companies don't care because you're less apt to get into an accident.
I'm not saying it's a conspiracy. It's just interesting what the gov't will do (or allow to be done) in the name of protecting the environment.
Post a Comment
<< Home