5/13/2009

Policy change at the EPA

The WSJ has this. It certainly seems like a big policy change to me. It looks to me that they are going after health care instead of global warming.

WASHINGTON -- The head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said Tuesday a finding that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are a public health danger won't necessarily lead to government regulation of emissions, an apparent about-face for the Obama administration.

The comments follow revelations of an administration document warning the EPA of potential economically harmful consequences from an agency finding last month that proposes declaring greenhouse gases a danger to the public. The document represents comments from various federal agencies, prepared by the Office of Management and Budget for EPA rule-making.

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson previously has said that such a decision "will indeed trigger the beginning of regulation of CO2," echoing similar remarks by White House climate czar Carol Browner.

But speaking before the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, Ms. Jackson said Tuesday: "The endangerment finding is a scientific finding mandated by law...It does not mean regulation."

EPA spokeswoman Adora Andy later said Jackson was referring to the proposal, and not a final endangerment designation. "No news here," Ms. Adora said, adding: "The proposed finding does not mean instant regulations." . . . .

Labels: , ,

2 Comments:

Blogger Dad29 said...

I don't believe her disclaimer at all. Not for one millisecond.

5/13/2009 10:07 AM  
Blogger 1 said...

Consider the following from, "Watts Up With That": Leaked OMB CO2 memo: “no demonstrated direct health effects”

5/13/2009 8:49 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home