4/23/2009

The nonsense of Obama's inconsistent standards in running companies

This piece nails the arbitrariness of Obama's policies on the auto companies.

as [Obama] tries to dictate the terms of what amounts to an out-of-court bankruptcy for Chrysler and GM. He wants Chrysler's secured lenders to give up their right to nearly full recovery in a bankruptcy in return for 15 cents on the dollar. They'd be crazy to do so, of course, except that these banks also happen to be beholden to the administration for TARP money.

Wasn't TARP supposed to be about restoring a healthy banking system? Isn't that a tad inconsistent with banks just voluntarily relinquishing valuable claims on borrowers? Don't ask.

Kingly prerogative also conflicts with kingly prerogative in the case of GM's unsecured creditors, who are the sticking point in agreeing to a turnaround plan by the drop-dead date of June 1. His retainer, Steven Rattner, has delivered word that the king's pleasure is that these unsecured creditors give up 100% of their claims in return for GM stock.

It may also be the king's pleasure, he advised, to convert at some point the government's own $13 billion in bailout loans into GM stock.

There's just one problem: Why on earth would GM's creditors -- who include not just bondholders but the UAW's health-care trust -- want any part of this deal?

They've already seen that the rights and privileges of shareholders are not worth diddly when the king is throwing his prerogatives around. He dispensed with the services of GM chief Rick Wagoner, though the king owned not a single share of GM stock at the time. His minions communicated the king's pleasure that GM consider discontinuing its GMC brand, maker of pickups and SUVs that offendeth the royal eye -- though these vehicles earn GM's fattest profit margins.

His minions haven't asked GM to give up the Chevy Volt, even after determining it will be a profitless black hole, because of the king's fondness for green.
. . .

Labels: ,

2 Comments:

Blogger Martin G. Schalz said...

Has it ever occured to anyone here that BHO has earned his magazine cover that depicts him as FDR?

4/23/2009 2:49 PM  
Blogger ICONIC FREEDOM said...

The Age of Subjectivism

http://iconicfreedom.blogspot.com/2009/04/age-of-subjectivism.html


the majority of issues in our government are directly related to personal subjective opinion rather than asking how each action taken upholds our Constitution.

until society holds accountable themselves for injecting their subjective opinion into the lives of others by which to control, they will not be able to hold accountable our legislators

4/24/2009 7:20 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home