Washington State Supreme Court Says People can Shoot Wild Animals in Self-Defense
[I]t may be justly said that one who kills an elk in defense of himself or his property, if such a killing was reasonably necessary for such purpose, is not guilty of violating the law.
The only sad thing is that such a common sense ruling requires someone to go to court and fight the issue all the way up to the state Supreme Court. In this case, the guy engaged in "repeated requests" for help from the state and still had to go through this long court battle. Sonya Jones posted her own discussion of the decision posted here.
Labels: DefensiveGunUse, PropertyRights
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home