I really like the point further down in the article that if current warming trends are due to a spike in emissions that first occurred as a result of the Industrial Revolution, then there is no reason to believe the warming trends will continue for long at this rate b/c emissions are no longer spiking, or something like that. Logic: the worst enemy of enviro wackos.
It's funny that you describe Richard Lindzen as "not pulling his punches" because in fact he has backed way considerably from his well-documented earlier positions on Global Warming.
Here is a rough history of his evolving position:
(1) There is no global warming. (2) There is global warming, but it is minor and not anthropogenic. (3) There is significant anthropogenic global warming, but it is not a serious social, political, or ecological problem.
Give Lindzen credit for modifying his views in response to evidence.
2 Comments:
I really like the point further down in the article that if current warming trends are due to a spike in emissions that first occurred as a result of the Industrial Revolution, then there is no reason to believe the warming trends will continue for long at this rate b/c emissions are no longer spiking, or something like that. Logic: the worst enemy of enviro wackos.
It's funny that you describe Richard Lindzen as "not pulling his punches" because in fact he has backed way considerably from his well-documented earlier positions on Global Warming.
Here is a rough history of his evolving position:
(1) There is no global warming.
(2) There is global warming, but it is minor and not anthropogenic.
(3) There is significant anthropogenic global warming, but it is not a serious social, political, or ecological problem.
Give Lindzen credit for modifying his views in response to evidence.
Post a Comment
<< Home