Yet more evidence that these killers are deterred by people with guns: Charleston, South Carolina Church Shooter

Dylann Roof
As I have previously pointed out how mass public shooting after mass public shooting keep occurring where guns are banned. Here is yet another case of these killers avoiding places where people with guns might be able to stop their killing spree. From the Associated Press:
Last week, while they were drinking in the back of Scriven's house, Roof blurted out his plan about carrying out a mass shooting at the College of Charleston.
"I don't think the church was his primary target because he told us he was going for the school," Scriven said Friday. "But I think he couldn't get into the school because of the security ... so I think he just settled for the church." . . .
Here is what the College of Charleston puts up regarding their armed officers.
Police officers responding to an active shooter are trained to proceed immediately to the area in which shots were last heard in order to stop the shooting as quickly as possible. The first responding officers may be in teams; they may be dressed in normal patrol uniforms, or they may be wearing external ballistic vests and Kevlar helmets or other tactical gear. The officers may be armed with rifles, shotguns or handguns. Do exactly as the officers instruct. The first responding officers will be focused on stopping the active shooter and creating a safe environment for medical assistance to be brought in to aid the injured. . . .
I have spoken recently about mass public shootings at the law school at the College of Charleston, and given that it was my topic, I checked out the security measures at the school.  There were no metal detectors present, just a reliance on armed campus security.
The media generally ignores that these attacks keep occurring where guns are banned, instead concentrating on how the killer obtained the gun or the weapon used. Yet, it is very hard to stop people who are planning these attacks over 6 months in advance from getting a weapon. Background checks and other "solutions" wouldn't stop these attacks that are being used to motivate the laws.
"His mom had taken the gun from him and somehow he went back and took it from her."
(We have previously noted that Greta's show on Fox News interviewed one of the killer's friends who had said that the killer had stolen the gun he used from his mom without her knowing it.)

Labels: ,


Blogger Mochamad Fauzi Noer said...

Thank for information

6/21/2015 9:57 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

In fact, South Carolina has a specific criminal statute that prohibits carrying firearms into a church. Just another form of government advertising of a victim laden "free fire" zone.

These shooters are mental defects, obviously, but moreover they are cowards. What may best end the copycat continuation of these acts is not the unrelenting media autopsy of the gunman's beliefs and upbringing, but will instead be a fortuitous video of the trench coat mafia type getting cut down mid attack by an armed citizen. Replay the video relentlessly; mock the dead assailant as a loser of the first order. THAT is what these loner types existentially fear: getting made fun of on Youtube for eternity.

6/22/2015 4:39 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home