Are there systematic biases in the jobs numbers?
Is there really a conspiracy in how the jobs numbers are put together? In the past, I have expressed doubt in such claims, but the odds of such consistent errors seems to be becoming more and more remote (see here). From the WSJ:
Labels: ObamaDishonest, unemployment
1 Comments:
I've questioned for some time if the numbers weren't cooked. I think it all comes down to Methods of Perceived Economics. They are in the business of spin and I think they are actively spinning the numbers so that people "feel" okay.
The revisions, the not counting of those who give up looking, etc is to me a form of manipulation.
Post a Comment
<< Home