Appearance on CSPAN Washington Journal for Thursday, Jan. 13
Labels: appearances, GunControl, television
Welcome! Follow me on twitter at @johnrlottjr or at https://crimeresearch.org. Please e-mail questions to johnrlott@crimeresearch.org.
Labels: appearances, GunControl, television
posted by John Lott at 2:24 PM
My commentary on a broad array of economics and crime related issues.
Dumbing Down the Courts: How Politics Keeps the Smartest Judges Off the Bench
Straight Shooting: Firearms, Economics and Public Policy
Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe?
-Research finding a drop in violent crime rates from Right-to-carry laws
-Ranking Economists
-Interview with the Washington Post
-Debate on "Guns Reduce Crime"
-Appalachian law school attack
-Sources for Defensive Gun Uses
-The Merced Pitchfork Killings
-Fraudulent website pretending to be run by me
-Steve Levitt's Correction Letter
-Ian Ayres and John Donohue
-Other issues regarding Steve Levitt
-National Academies of Science Panel on Firearms
-Baghdad murder rate
-Arming Pilots
-General discussion of my 1997 and 2002 surveys as well as related surveys
-Problems with Wikipedia
-Errata for Gun Books
-US Supreme Court Wire
-Futures for Financial Markets
-judgepedia
Economist and Law Professor David D. Friedman's Blog
Larry Elder's The Elder Statement
Economist Robert G. Hansen's Blog
Firearmstruth.com -- a media-watchdog website
A debate that I had with George Mason University's Robert Ehrlich on guns
Lyonette Louis-Jacques's page on Firearms Regulation Worldwide
An interview concerning More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws
The End of Myth: An Interview with Dr. John Lott
Art DeVany's website, one of the more innovative economists in the last few decades
St. Cloud State University Scholars
Bryan Caplan at George Mason University
Alphecca -- weekly review on the media's coverage of guns
Xrlq -- Some interesting coverage of the law.
Career Police Officer
Gun Law News
Georgia Right-to-Carry
Darnell's The Independent Conservative Blog
Robert Stacy McCain's Blog
Clayton Cramer's Blog
My hidden mathematical ability (a math professor with the same name)
geekwitha45
My Old AEI Web Page
Wrightwing's blog
Al Lowe's blog
St. Maximos' Hut
Dad29
Elizabeth Blackney's blog
Eric Rasmusen
Your "Economics" Portal to the World by Larry Low
William Sjostrom
Dr. T's EconLinks.com
Interview with National Review Online
Blog at Newsmax.com
Pieces I have written at BigGovernment.com
Updated Media Analysis of Appalachian Law School Attack
Journal of Legal Studies paper on spoiled ballots during the 2000 Presidential Election
Data set from USA Today, STATA 7.0 data set
"Do" File for some of the basic regressions from the paper
4 Comments:
Great effort John.
If only us 'civilised' Brits could have a debate on this subject, without constant screaming and interruptions.
The callers seemed to focus most on magazine size. That is the thrust of the anti-gun rights crowd in Congress right now, with McCarthy in the House and Lautenberg in the Senate introducing legislation to resurrect the 10-round magazine limit. Coincidental callers?
Disarming private citizens is a terrible idea, and yet that is ultimately the view that has long been pushed by the disingenuous Helmke, to a greater or a lesser extent, depending on what the market will bear at the time. I see Helmke standing beside a slippery slope with a bucket of grease, a large grease brush, and a grin from one ear to the other.
I would not feel comfortable, and I cannot imagine that anyone would feel comfortable, with an AR-15 (the most popular rifle in the US) for home defense that has only a tiny, little, ten-round magazine in it.
Who is Paul Helmke to tell me that my life is only worth ten rounds?
It’s my life on the line, not his, and thus the size of the magazine I have for my defense is properly my choice, not his. Helmke is wrong to take my freedom to choose away from me.
Helmke is not interested in increasing penalties for criminals who misuse larger magazines, which would only impact criminals, as is appropriate. Instead, he wants to impose a magazine ban that would impact all lawful gun owners, with the erroneous presumption that they all might as well be criminals, so that he can smugly pretend that he‘s prevented crimes, when he has done no such thing. We’ve already tried this nonsense, and it didn’t work. Enough is enough!
Paul Helmke claims to be a "mid-west Republican" now?
My dying ass!
I don't know about you, Chas, but I would be delighted to have 10 rounds of .223 for home defense. It beats 4 shells of #4 buckshot, for sure.
That said, I'd be even more delighted to have an extended P-Mag in the same AR, if my state allowed it...
Post a Comment
<< Home