Piece that my son Roger helped write up at the Washington Times
He also has a book review here: A (flawed) case against contractors.
Labels: religion, rogerlott, Washingtontimes
Welcome! Follow me on twitter at @johnrlottjr or at https://crimeresearch.org. Please e-mail questions to johnrlott@crimeresearch.org.
Labels: religion, rogerlott, Washingtontimes
posted by John Lott at 12:23 AM
My commentary on a broad array of economics and crime related issues.
Dumbing Down the Courts: How Politics Keeps the Smartest Judges Off the Bench
Straight Shooting: Firearms, Economics and Public Policy
Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe?
-Research finding a drop in violent crime rates from Right-to-carry laws
-Ranking Economists
-Interview with the Washington Post
-Debate on "Guns Reduce Crime"
-Appalachian law school attack
-Sources for Defensive Gun Uses
-The Merced Pitchfork Killings
-Fraudulent website pretending to be run by me
-Steve Levitt's Correction Letter
-Ian Ayres and John Donohue
-Other issues regarding Steve Levitt
-National Academies of Science Panel on Firearms
-Baghdad murder rate
-Arming Pilots
-General discussion of my 1997 and 2002 surveys as well as related surveys
-Problems with Wikipedia
-Errata for Gun Books
-US Supreme Court Wire
-Futures for Financial Markets
-judgepedia
Economist and Law Professor David D. Friedman's Blog
Larry Elder's The Elder Statement
Economist Robert G. Hansen's Blog
Firearmstruth.com -- a media-watchdog website
A debate that I had with George Mason University's Robert Ehrlich on guns
Lyonette Louis-Jacques's page on Firearms Regulation Worldwide
An interview concerning More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws
The End of Myth: An Interview with Dr. John Lott
Art DeVany's website, one of the more innovative economists in the last few decades
St. Cloud State University Scholars
Bryan Caplan at George Mason University
Alphecca -- weekly review on the media's coverage of guns
Xrlq -- Some interesting coverage of the law.
Career Police Officer
Gun Law News
Georgia Right-to-Carry
Darnell's The Independent Conservative Blog
Robert Stacy McCain's Blog
Clayton Cramer's Blog
My hidden mathematical ability (a math professor with the same name)
geekwitha45
My Old AEI Web Page
Wrightwing's blog
Al Lowe's blog
St. Maximos' Hut
Dad29
Elizabeth Blackney's blog
Eric Rasmusen
Your "Economics" Portal to the World by Larry Low
William Sjostrom
Dr. T's EconLinks.com
Interview with National Review Online
Blog at Newsmax.com
Pieces I have written at BigGovernment.com
Updated Media Analysis of Appalachian Law School Attack
Journal of Legal Studies paper on spoiled ballots during the 2000 Presidential Election
Data set from USA Today, STATA 7.0 data set
"Do" File for some of the basic regressions from the paper
1 Comments:
I like the article, although some assumptions are made which are not necessarily factual, that flies in the face of this blog.
We don't know the motivations of the teachers in question.
We don't know for a fact if people involved are "hostile" to religion.
We do know that there is much confusion in society, propagated sadly by the religious, that religion is "meant to be in our schools, on government property..."etc.
Clearly, the girl reading her bible has little impact with the exception that perhaps the teacher lacked knowledge of appropriate reading material, which may have included no religious text. Would you be okay if a boy came in and was reading from the Koran, knowing the indoctrination component?
The child in question regarding the cross, it was later reported, the father didn't show the original picture which concerned teachers in its depiction.
We scream because teachers don't do enough, then we scream when they're overly cautious and want to make ourselves out to be victims.
Does it matter he drew a picture of someone(himself) on a cross? Again, what if it was himself strapping a bomb to himself showing himself blowing people up? That's another religion's form of promotion in their doctrine.
Get government out of education and this goes away. Parents can put their children in schools which represent their particular views, religious or not. Until then we need to be cautious about making claims, making accusations, and drawing correlation to conclusion with regard to this issue.
If you look to be offended or victimized, certainly you will find it.
Post a Comment
<< Home