11/05/2008
- Name: John Lott
- Location: Virginia, United States
About Me
My commentary on a broad array of economics and crime related issues.
Most of my posts are now at the Crime Prevention Research Center. Our work is very important and you will find the latest information available there. Please click here or go to crimeresearch.org to get that information.
E-mail: johnrlott@crimeresearch.org
Academic Papers
- Terms of Use
Copyright 2005 by John R. Lott, Jr. All rights reserved
My Op-eds
More Books of Mine
Dumbing Down the Courts: How Politics Keeps the Smartest Judges Off the Bench
Straight Shooting: Firearms, Economics and Public Policy
Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe?
Reviews of Freedomnomics
Other Web sites
Previous Posts
- More Democrats advocate "Fairness Doctrine"
- minor puzzle: Obama predicts a million plus at his...
- Talks this week.
- New research on Right-to-carry laws
- Childish behavior by Obama?
- "Obama Maintains Overall Swing State Advertising L...
- Massive Coal tax: Not only is it bad economics, bu...
- New Op-ed up at Fox News: The tilt towards Democrats
- If the Investor's Business Daily survey is right, ...
- Obama and Biden Flip-flop on Homosexual marriage
Book Reviews
- For a list of book reviews on The Bias Against Guns, click here.
Interesting Past Topics
-Research finding a drop in violent crime rates from Right-to-carry laws
-Ranking Economists
-Interview with the Washington Post
-Debate on "Guns Reduce Crime"
-Appalachian law school attack
-Sources for Defensive Gun Uses
-The Merced Pitchfork Killings
-Fraudulent website pretending to be run by me
-Steve Levitt's Correction Letter
-Ian Ayres and John Donohue
-Other issues regarding Steve Levitt
-National Academies of Science Panel on Firearms
-Baghdad murder rate
-Arming Pilots
-General discussion of my 1997 and 2002 surveys as well as related surveys
-Problems with Wikipedia
-Errata for Gun Books
-US Supreme Court Wire
-Futures for Financial Markets
-judgepedia
Links
Economist and Law Professor David D. Friedman's Blog
Larry Elder's The Elder Statement
Economist Robert G. Hansen's Blog
Firearmstruth.com -- a media-watchdog website
A debate that I had with George Mason University's Robert Ehrlich on guns
Lyonette Louis-Jacques's page on Firearms Regulation Worldwide
An interview concerning More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws
The End of Myth: An Interview with Dr. John Lott
Art DeVany's website, one of the more innovative economists in the last few decades
St. Cloud State University Scholars
Bryan Caplan at George Mason University
Alphecca -- weekly review on the media's coverage of guns
Xrlq -- Some interesting coverage of the law.
Career Police Officer
Gun Law News
Georgia Right-to-Carry
Darnell's The Independent Conservative Blog
Robert Stacy McCain's Blog
Clayton Cramer's Blog
My hidden mathematical ability (a math professor with the same name)
geekwitha45
My Old AEI Web Page
Wrightwing's blog
Al Lowe's blog
St. Maximos' Hut
Dad29
Elizabeth Blackney's blog
Eric Rasmusen
Your "Economics" Portal to the World by Larry Low
William Sjostrom
Dr. T's EconLinks.com
Interview with National Review Online
Blog at Newsmax.com
Pieces I have written at BigGovernment.com
Data
- Johnlott.org
(description of book, downloadable data sets, and discussions of previous controversies)
Updated Media Analysis of Appalachian Law School Attack
Journal of Legal Studies paper on spoiled ballots during the 2000 Presidential Election
Data set from USA Today, STATA 7.0 data set
"Do" File for some of the basic regressions from the paper
3 Comments:
This is the same old argument.
The opposition likes to think that somehow when we have a gun ban all the criminals will no longer have guns. Everyone knows that this is not the case. If every gun owner in America turned in their guns, the criminals would just smile and feel more comfortable as they invade another home, rape, rob, and kill. If people are allowed to keep a gun the criminal doesn't have a clue who may be able to defend themselves. This allows a residual effect of protecting not only the armed but also the unarmed. The criminal simply will not feel comfortable entering someones house if they have no idea if a gun may be used against them.
If you don't want a gun for yourself, don't get one, but don't tell me I can't have one.
It would have been nice if there was more time to directly answer the audience's questions- rather than the moderator's, or spend time going at it with the "brady" side.
The audience members had legitimate questions they needed answers to, and I think a lot more might have changed their minds in favor had they gotten them.
Great job with this. You and Kleck were titans of truth as you decimated the other panel.
If you beat Helmke in enough debates, maybe he will give up and start selling used cars.
Post a Comment
<< Home