Republicans are apparently "racist" if they elect or appoint a black to office, but they are also racist if they oppose a black democrat

From Jeff Jacoby:

Writing Wednesday in The New York Times, University of Pennsylvania political scientist Adolph Reed Jr.was in a similar froth, slamming Scott because he doesn't think with his skin. "His politics, like those of the archconservative Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas, are utterly at odds with the preferences of most black Americans." Scott has no legitimate connection to "mainstream black politics," Reed scoffed. He's just another "cynical token" – one more black Republican elected to Congress from a majority-white district. 
It's an old story by now, this venomous lashing-out at blacks and other minorities who embrace conservative or Republican values. It especially infuriates the Democratic left to see the enthusiasm black conservatives inspire among Republicans. Far from celebrating the fact that minorities can demonstrate appeal across the political spectrum, the left whips out the race card. The rise of black Republican leaders, they say, is just a thin disguise for GOP racism. Yet if Republicans oppose a black Democratic leader, they call that racism too.

Labels: ,


Blogger Kevink said...

Well duhhhh, anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

12/26/2012 11:31 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home