Is this possibly right?: "White House 'Held Affair Over Petraeus's Head' For Favorable Testimony On Benghazi"

It is very hard to believe that even the Obama administration would do this.  It is also hard to believe that this claim could be proved since it is not in Petraeus' interest to acknowledge that he was blackmailed into providing false evidence to Congress.  However, if Krauthammer happens to be correct, it will indicate that the Obama administration thought that they were going to lose the election if they didn't hide the information on the Benghazi attack.



Blogger Martin G. Schalz said...

Obama and or his cronies delay releasing other stats until after the election was over, and this may not be another example of trying to influence the election?

Food Stamp stats delayed.

Unemployment numbers skewed by not counting a certain state.

Exit polls skewed by not including a certain state.

Patterns do show one's actions, and are darn good in predicting future behaviors.

As for I, I find that Mr. Krauthammers observations are very good and do hold up over time, as his grasp of human nature is exceptional.

11/14/2012 12:25 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home