It looks like DC's gun laws will soon be history

Giving the DC delegate the right to vote in Congress suddenly seems more important to the Democrats than their strong opposition to gun ownership.

Congressional leaders intend to resurrect a D.C. voting rights bill as early as next week, despite opposition from many city leaders to an amendment that would eliminate most of the District's gun-control laws.

The final details of the bill were being worked out Wednesday, but House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) said he expects the legislation to clear the House and to include some version of the pro-gun language that has bogged down the measure since last year.

Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D), the city's non-voting House member, and congressional leaders said they are negotiating to weaken the gun amendment language. But Norton said she is unwilling to sacrifice the opportunity to win a long-sought voting seat for the District by insisting on a stand-alone bill.

"This is the best chance we've had to get a House vote for D.C. in my lifetime," Norton said. "Nobody would leave it on the table because it's not at all clear when there will be another chance."

The time is right, Norton and other advocates said, because the bill's prospects could diminish if the Democratic majority narrows after this year's midterm elections and if the release of 2010 Census figures undercuts the legislative deal. . . .



Blogger Mike Gallo said...

While I appreciate the efforts to help DC residents and visitors through the protection of their right to arms, I don't see how any of this squares with the Constitutional establishment of the District. Why wouldn't an amendment be required here?

4/16/2010 10:02 AM  
Blogger pops1911 said...

That was my thought exactly - not that the Democrats would even notice it required a Constitutional Amendment to change this. Nothing else seems to matter to them about the Constitution!!!

4/16/2010 3:43 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home